Post by mistyssaktersfo33 on Jan 8, 2024 6:19:46 GMT
This is equivalent to euros per year. Data protection authorities first in to have viewed the approach as an option to support news sites that have suffered from advertising revenue being lost to big tech platforms such as Google or Amazon. But now it seems that this is at least the plan. There are no different rules for media companies when it comes to consent that would allow for payment or the same as the CJEU’s Schrems ruling, a year after Max Schrems’s statement alleged a year ago that despite the CJEU’s rule under the EU that has been in effect since The law outlaws data transfers between the EU and the US for the second time but the ruling is seen as a milestone.
The past year has seemed mostly about distraction and finger-pointing on both sides, with each passing the blame onto the next person. Only a small number of European companies realize that the potential conflict between Email Marketing List EU data protection and US surveillance laws will not be resolved anytime soon and choose to store personal data in Europe or other safe locations rather than get stuck in an endless compliance nightmare in line with the US law. Despite the two clear rulings other European companies have often complained about the lack of guidance. When guidance is issued, such as the recent guidance, many believe it is unrealistic to comply with the legal requirements.
A group of industry lawyers and cloud providers have tried to fill the void with pseudo-guidance to keep calm and carry on and have developed increasingly primitive legal theories over the past year. These range from the absence of relevant parts of the risk-based approach to suggestions for non-functional supplementary measures such as fencing around data centers. Rather than investing in secure systems, these private sector stakeholders invest in PR campaigns disguised as compliance. It will be interesting to see whether EU businesses and customers will demand compensation if these promises turn out to be empty words. Data protection authorities have largely adopted a wait-and-see approach. With rare exceptions the data protection authority has not conducted any investigation or made any decision.
The past year has seemed mostly about distraction and finger-pointing on both sides, with each passing the blame onto the next person. Only a small number of European companies realize that the potential conflict between Email Marketing List EU data protection and US surveillance laws will not be resolved anytime soon and choose to store personal data in Europe or other safe locations rather than get stuck in an endless compliance nightmare in line with the US law. Despite the two clear rulings other European companies have often complained about the lack of guidance. When guidance is issued, such as the recent guidance, many believe it is unrealistic to comply with the legal requirements.
A group of industry lawyers and cloud providers have tried to fill the void with pseudo-guidance to keep calm and carry on and have developed increasingly primitive legal theories over the past year. These range from the absence of relevant parts of the risk-based approach to suggestions for non-functional supplementary measures such as fencing around data centers. Rather than investing in secure systems, these private sector stakeholders invest in PR campaigns disguised as compliance. It will be interesting to see whether EU businesses and customers will demand compensation if these promises turn out to be empty words. Data protection authorities have largely adopted a wait-and-see approach. With rare exceptions the data protection authority has not conducted any investigation or made any decision.